Many SEND kids really can’t thrive in mainstream school from day one: their needs are too complex for that setting, and those children really will learn and thrive best in a specialist setting. But places in those settings are incredibly difficult for SEND families to access: years upon years of service and funding cuts under the guise of "austerity" or "streamlining" or whatever buzzword those in charge wanted to use, mean there simply are not enough services or specialist school places or money to go round. So in spite of overwhelming need, a lot of SEND kids are trapped in mainstream schools, with their needs going unrecognised and unmet, year after year.Some families want to electively home educate (EHE) or use EOTAS (Education Other Than At School). Flexi schooling is another option. For many SEND families (and non-SEND families too), that’s the way they feel their child can learn best. I’m not going to go into these different options in any great depths in this book; they really need a book all to themselves, and there are lots of very good ones already out there. All I will say is if these are what families want to do, and it’s an active choice on your part, then I’m genuinely happy for you, and I wish everyone on those paths the very best of success.But an increasing number of families are finding:
- Even if EHE or EOTAS is not the ideal option
- And even if something like EHE wouldn’t necessarily meet the child’s needs or their particular learning style
- Or even if the parents themselves know in their hearts that they are just not cut out for home educating their child…
- Their child has been ground down to such a point of wreckage, that there’s no other choice left but to take their kids out of mainstream school
Where does that leave the SEND kids who want and really need the structure of being at school? What about the kids who really get a buzz from the school environment, who love the social aspect of school, and who would potentially be left feeling shut out and isolated if they left?They still deserve to have that option of being at school.
What about the kids like mine who, on paper, and with the right support in place, really ought to have thrived in mainstream school… but who really, really haven’t been able to?And what about parents like LongRoadDad and I?
- If I’d wanted to be (and had actually been suited to being!) a teacher, I would have trained as one years ago when I had the opportunity.
- Between them, Big Bruv and Little Sis have a detailed list of Special Educational Needs. Not just needs: Educational needs.
- Most importantly of all, our kids do not want us to be their teacher!
- School is school, home is home
- Our kids want us to be their mum and dad - not their educators!
"It must be a behavioural or a parenting problem.It must be yours, or your child’s fault.If your child only explodes at home, it must be a home problem.And that’s how my family's journey into the SEND world began – a journey filled with suspicion, punishment, blame and guilt, all of which were being piled on us and made a hundred times worse by our kids' school."- Luisa Gray, author We Are Not Seeing It
Luisa details how all education and Local Authority employees have a professional obligation to step up and do their lawful duty for the SEND children in their care. She also writes about the so-called 'social contract' that is meant to exist between school and home, and the five important elements of this that parents are rarely made aware of when their child starts school:
- "In Loco Parentis"
- The role of Teaching Assistants
- The Early Years Foundation Stage
- Teacher's Standards
- Quality First Teaching
The lack of basic knowledge of SEND law that I have experienced in LA officers is truly staggering. These are the people charged with commissioning EHC needs assessments (EHCNA - more on those later), writing our kids lawfully binding Education, Health and Care plans. (EHCPs - more on those later too) and commissioning services for SEND kids, yet who largely do not know even the basics of the statutory time frames they should adhere to – and even when they do know, they seem remarkably relaxed about stretching those time frames way beyond the statutory limits. The attitude is very often“well, what are you going to do about it? Make us stick to the lawful timelines! If you can… “Nor do these LA officers seem to have the slightest grasp on the vital, lawfully-enforceable, and deeply personal nature of the work they are doing.
- I have seen EHCPs with needs described in section B, and provision written in F (section F is the lawfully binding bit) that look more like a "nice to have" wish list, than a statutory document explicitly describing what the child’s needs actually are, and the provision required to meet them.
- I’ve seen EHCPs containing spelling mistakes and basic typing errors – completely unacceptable in a legal document
- I’ve seen EHCP working documents where the LA has changed text between Draft versions, and not highlighted the changes they have made (either through simple human error/lack of attention, or perhaps more worrying because they are hoping parents will not notice?)
- I have even seen EHCPs that have so obviously been produced by "cut & paste" that they get the child’s sex wrong, and sometimes have featured a completely different child’s name.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are always very much appreciated and can really help the conversation go further...